Yesterday, sometime before I taught my last class of the semester, the governor of Arizona signed House Bill 2281 into law.
The headlines are saying that Arizona has outlawed ethnic studies. In spirit and intent, I think that's correct. By the letter though, it seems like the law will be toothless. (That's not the same as harmless).
Here is what the bill says:
15-111. Declaration of Policy
THE LEGISLATURE FINDS AND DECLARES THAT PUBLIC SCHOOL PUPILS SHOULD BE TAUGHT TO TREAT AND VALUE EACH OTHER AS INDIVIDUALS AND NOT BE TAUGHT TO RESENT OR HATE OTHER RACES OR CLASSES OF PEOPLE.
15-112. Prohibited courses and classes: enforcement
A SCHOOL DISTRICT OR CHARTER SCHOOL IN THIS STATE SHALL NOT INCLUDE IN ITS PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION ANY COURSES OR CLASSES THAT INCLUDE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. PROMOTE THE OVERTHROW OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.
2. PROMOTE RESENTMENT TOWARD A RACE OR CLASS OF PEOPLE.
3. ARE DESIGNED PRIMARILY FOR PUPILS OF A PARTICULAR ETHNIC GROUP.
4. ADVOCATE ETHNIC SOLIDARITY INSTEAD OF THE TREATMENT OF PUPILS AS INDIVIDUALS.
So, could I teach my Filipino American History & Biography class in Arizona? Well, let's see...
1. The title of the last series of slides I showed yesterday is "Claim America." I want them to look for their identity here in America and not just in the Philippines. I want to encourage Filipino Americans and others taking my class to act like they own America, especially the government. Overthrow? Nope, not in my class.
2. Learning about the injustices caused by white people who believed they had the burden of uplifting the brown masses of the world (Rudyard Kipling, look it up), could cause resentment. But my students are smart enough not to blame their white classmates. Really, though, who is promoting resentment? Clearly, the white establishment in Arizona resents Chicanos for asserting their right to define what is relevant in education--and getting it funded. This bill promotes resentment.
3. Well, yes, most of the curricula are written with a for-us-by-us philosophy. But Filipinos comprise only 25% of my students. I must be offering something valuable to the white, black, Ethiopian, Palestinian, Guatemalan, Korean, Iranian, Haitian and other students who have taken this FUBU class.
4. What if I want to advocate for ethnic solidarity AND treatment of pupils as individuals? Would that be okay? In fact, I generally rail against calls for ethnic unity. I cross it out when I read it in student papers. Solidarity and unity for a cause, like health care reform, I can promote. But when I hear people calling for Filipinos to be more unified, what I hear is them saying, why can't you do things my way? or, why can't you be more like me? We are a diverse lot, us Filipinos. No need to iron out that diversity for some abstract ideal of ethnic solidarity.
Of course, the white establishment that backed this law doesn't see any of this nuance. And ultimately, they won't get what they want. Like all laws, it seems like they had to compromise. Later, the bill says:
THIS SECTION SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO RESTRICT OR PROHIBIT:
1. COURSES OR CLASSES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN PUPILS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW.
(Yes federal law still trumps state law).
2. THE GROUPING OF PUPILS ACCORDING TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING CAPABILITY IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, THAT MAY RESULT IN A DISPARATE IMPACT BY ETHNICITY.
(Okay, good we recognize the needs of students who are limited English proficient).
3. COURSES OR CLASSES THAT INCLUDE THE HISTORY OF ANY ETHNIC GROUP AND THAT ARE OPEN TO ALL STUDENTS, UNLESS THE COURSE OR CLASS VIOLATES SUBSECTION A.
(Well, yeah, anyone can take my course).
4. COURSES OR CLASSES THAT INCLUDE THE DISCUSSION OF CONTROVERSIAL ASPECTS OF HISTORY.
(Well, really, yeah. Controversy is a really good teaching tool).
F. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO RESTRICT OR PROHIBIT THE INSTRUCTION OF THE HOLOCAUST, ANY OTHER INSTANCE OF GENOCIDE, OR THE HISTORICAL OPPRESSION OF A PARTICULAR GROUP OF PEOPLE BASED ON ETHNICITY, RACE, OR CLASS.
Well, thanks! But then, what's the point of the law? This last item especially seems to contradict, in spirit if not the letter, what its proponents are trying to accomplish. I can teach about historical oppression of one ethnic group AND not promote resentment or ethnic solidarity. So I can teach my class in Arizona.
First thing on the syllabus, the Bell-Trade Act: How the U.S. crippled the Philippines even after independence. Assignment: apply this lesson to U.S. trade policy with Mexico. As Mark Twain once said, history does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.
The Great U-turn
-
This year I find my self being reminded of the fall of Ferdinand Marcos in
the mid-1980s and LA Rebellion in the early 1990s when I’ve been a
reluctant wit...
5 years ago